Reading "The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People" by Stephen Covey, I came across this gem.
"Dependent people need others to get what they want. Independent people can get what they want through their own effort. Interdependent people combine their own efforts with the efforts of others to achieve their greatest success."
He also defines "dependent" as "you", "independent" as "I", and "interdependent" as "we".
There is so much in this book, that I'm sure I will have to read it several times to get most of it and will never get it all. I did want to touch on this part right no though.
He calls the movement through dependence, independence, and interdependence, the "maturity continuum". As we grow as humans, we progress through this. So many of us believe that independence is the ultimate goal, but we can only go so far with that. And that works on many levels as well. Personally, we can only grow so much depending on others for information. And we can only grow so much through our effort alone. But if we become interdependent, we can achieve so much more. We can use our strengths, along with others, to become more than any of the individuals alone. And this goes for homesteading, raising children, education, business, government, etc.
But have learned to be so dependent upon the government and it's authority that some of us have yearned to become independent and do it all ourselves? Is that the goal? Or should we move on through to interdependence and learn to cooperate our efforts within out community to become more?
I think interdependence can do wonders, but it only works on the local level for most things. We can have our national government make deals and such with other national governments regarding local issues like education and farming, and expect that to benefit us. We can have that in regards to peace treaties and free trade agreements. That is what "promote the general welfare" means. But as for the cost of roads, local schools, and emergency preparedness, that should be left to the local governments.
Does this make any sense?
"Dependent people need others to get what they want. Independent people can get what they want through their own effort. Interdependent people combine their own efforts with the efforts of others to achieve their greatest success."
He also defines "dependent" as "you", "independent" as "I", and "interdependent" as "we".
There is so much in this book, that I'm sure I will have to read it several times to get most of it and will never get it all. I did want to touch on this part right no though.
He calls the movement through dependence, independence, and interdependence, the "maturity continuum". As we grow as humans, we progress through this. So many of us believe that independence is the ultimate goal, but we can only go so far with that. And that works on many levels as well. Personally, we can only grow so much depending on others for information. And we can only grow so much through our effort alone. But if we become interdependent, we can achieve so much more. We can use our strengths, along with others, to become more than any of the individuals alone. And this goes for homesteading, raising children, education, business, government, etc.
But have learned to be so dependent upon the government and it's authority that some of us have yearned to become independent and do it all ourselves? Is that the goal? Or should we move on through to interdependence and learn to cooperate our efforts within out community to become more?
I think interdependence can do wonders, but it only works on the local level for most things. We can have our national government make deals and such with other national governments regarding local issues like education and farming, and expect that to benefit us. We can have that in regards to peace treaties and free trade agreements. That is what "promote the general welfare" means. But as for the cost of roads, local schools, and emergency preparedness, that should be left to the local governments.
Does this make any sense?
